Families-First.com | Homeschool Zone | Events-of-the-Week | Bookstore | Marketplace
click here to support our sponsors
Help support Families-First! - please visit our sponsors

  go to Families-First.com Families-First.comThe News Desk
Should Your Meat be Irradiated?
by Joe Spataro
go see the event of the week
  I read this press release and wondered how much people understood what the implications of meat irradiation are. Is it a good idea? What are the benefits? What are the risks? Read the press release below and tell us your opinion.

Press Release
Opinion
"we are already part of the experiment"

Press Release | Opinion | top
Type: Press Release
Release Date: 25-Feb-1999
STERIS to Weigh-In on USDA Proposed Rule for Meat Irradiation MENTOR, Ohio, Feb. 25 /PRNewswire/NEWSdesk -- STERIS Corporation (NYSE: STE) today announced its intention to file comments during the public review period on the newly-published United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) rule for the irradiation of meat and meat products to reduce levels of food borne pathogens and to extend shelf life. The United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) previously approved the irradiation of red meat on December 2, 1997. Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman announced the proposed rule on February 12, 1999. The proposed rule appeared yesterday in the Federal Register with comments to be allowed through April 26, 1999. STERIS anticipates that a final rule will not be issued by the USDA until several weeks after the end of the comment period. Speaking about the USDA action, Bill R. Sanford, Chairman, President, and CEO of STERIS Corporation, stated, "There are few things more important to society than ensuring that the food we eat is safe. The recent widely reported instances of food contamination and the heightened awareness of the dangers of salmonella, E. coli bacteria 0157:H7, and listeria have put this matter squarely on the public agenda. "John Masefield, Chairman and CEO of Isomedix, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of STERIS, is the principal author of the 1994 meat irradiation petition that the FDA approved over a year ago. We are proud of that accomplishment and believe the USDA public comment process is another important step toward the broader adoption of safe, scientifically-proven irradiation technology to help protect consumers from food borne disease." Mr. Sanford continued, "As a global leader in infection and contamination prevention in the health care, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, biomedical, and research industries, STERIS is in a unique position to apply its expertise in the food industry. Although the final USDA rule governing limited meat irradiation applications will likely be forthcoming in a few months, there is much to do before food irradiation can be widely used. The new rule will only apply to fresh meats and does not cover items such as hot dogs and luncheon meats. In addition, the industry will need to modify or construct processing facilities, install and validate irradiation systems, improve aseptic practices, and address numerous logistics challenges." Mr. Sanford concluded, "In the interim, STERIS has a multitude of other anti-microbial systems, products, services, and technologies that can be used today in a systems approach to greatly enhance food safety throughout the entire food chain. Just as STERIS has provided comprehensive solutions to such critical challenges as the aseptic packaging of pharmaceuticals and the sterilization of medical devices, we are already bringing our expertise and capabilities to the food industry through our new Food Safety Division. STERIS will also continue to play a leadership role to expand the safe and effective use of irradiation as another weapon in the fight to assure that the United States food supply continues to be the safest in the world." STERIS Corporation is a leading provider of infection prevention, contamination prevention, microbial reduction, and surgical support systems, products, services, and technologies to health care, scientific, research, food, and industrial Customers throughout the world. The Company has over 4,500 Associates (employees) worldwide, including more than 1,700 direct sales, service, and field support personnel. Customer Support facilities are located in major global market centers with production operations in the United States, Canada, Germany, Finland, and Sweden. This press release contains statements concerning certain trends and other forward-looking information affecting or relating to the Company and its industry that are intended to qualify for the protections afforded "forward- looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There are many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Many of these important factors are outside STERIS's control. Changes in market conditions, including competitive factors and changes in government regulations, could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations. No assurance can be provided as to any future financial results. Other potentially negative factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include (a) the possibility that the continuing integration of acquired businesses will take longer than anticipated, (b) the potential for increased pressure on pricing that leads to erosion in profit margins, (c) the possibility that market demand will not develop for new technologies, products, and applications, (d) the potential effects of fluctuations in foreign currencies, and (e) the possibility of reduced demand, or reductions in the rate of growth in demand, for the Company's products. SOURCE STERIS Corporation CONTACT: Gerard J. Reis, Vice President Associate and Business Relations, of STERIS, +1 440-354-2600 IN: HEA MTC

Families-First.com
The News Desk
Do you have an opinion?
Join the discussion
 
Press Release | Opinion | top
  Your Opinion From Courtney Jones morley.bregman@sympatico.ca
I am a quality assurance manager at an apple juice factory, and have had the opportunity to make organic apple juice. Let me assure you, organic apples are just that...organic!!! They are generally the most rotten and moldy apples around our plant. To support this factlet me point out another little- known fact, patulin is a highly toxic chemical found on apples and in apple juice. It is not man-made, but a product of nature. It is a byproduct of mold (mold poop if I may). The World Health Organization has put a limit of 50 parts per billion of patulin in apple juice (that's like $50 in a $billion). When our plant makes organic apple juice it is not uncommon to see levels of patulin in the 300 ppb range!

I fully support the irradiation of some of our nation's food supply. Talk to some of the parents whose children have died from E.coli. contamination (beef or unpasteurized apple juice), I'm sure they would agree that something must be done. If we do not study the effects of radiation on the food supply, we will continue down the road of blindness when it comes to the benefits of the nuclear industry, and continue to deplete our earth of its natural resources. When the power of the atom is used wisely, we stand to benefit in areas we have never dreamed possible.

From: Roni Bregman
morley.bregman@sympatico.ca
Last year my youngest daughter asked a very wise question.  She wondered why there were so many news stories about food poisoning, illnesses caused by contaminated foods, and out and out concerns about the quality of our foods.

Why a good question?  Well, if you are going to hear about the problems with food, what are you going to do to fix it?  Like the cavalry, food irradiation rides to the rescue.  It will make sure all the bacteria, microbes, etc are killed.  What it doesn't do is distinguish the good from the bad.  So, we are going to be part of a vast experiment to change the quality of our food---but the germs will be destroyed.  We won't know how it
will affect us---until things start going wrong.  Ah well, even more reason to eat only fresh organic foods.

The only benefits will be - less immediate food spoilage, less food poisoning and disease,  and more food to market---thus more profits. 

We just don't know whether or not the benefits outweigh the risks and that's
the problem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many of the foods that we are eating are "manufactured".  They come from huge factory-type farms, go through major processing, and are genetically altered.  We are the experiment---whether we want it or not.

From: Mary
MaCiCi@aol.com
Roni,
Thank you for an insightful message.  I agree with your comments re: we are the experiment, whether or not we want to be.  I am trying to turn more toward an organic way of life, but with home, child, work, class, it is quite a challenge!  It is interesting how the consumer mentality has pervaded my approach to life on even subliminal levels.  It has to be a conscious decision to not do some things that were a part of my life, so that I have time to do things like turn the compost pile, peel potatoes instead of purchase frozen ones, put out boric acid for insect control in my house instead of having someone spray poison around (not to mention put up with stray bugs...ever consider how a bug-free home may be a dangerous sign?  Especially in the areas -wooded or warmer climes- where bugs are around more.  Absence of small life is not good for us...these things accumulate in our systems over time.  We're bigger, but not immune.)  But, we are worth it, our children and neighbors are worth it.  I think the most important thing that we can do is make a private decision to make our surroundings and foods safer, and then be an example to others.  There are plenty of resources out there regarding making our lives healthier.  It all starts with one person - ourselves. Organic meats and vegetables are more expensive, so are organic fertilizers (except compost!). The old-fashioned ways of pest control takes more time (typically a fraction of the cost...)  But then, the incidence of brain tumors among two year olds is higher than it ever has been.  Penny wise?  Read the book "Silent Spring" written by a former scientist for the Department of Agriculture, who was astounded that the government refused to share information regarding environmental dangers, with the public.  I am NOT anti-government.  I am for knowing the options, and consquences, so that we may make informed decisions I'll get off my soap box now.  Thanks for the chance to blow off some steam! Good health to everyone and your families.   Mary.
  Questions? Problems? Ideas? contact webmaster@families-first.com

Families-First Visitor
Zone Visitor
ff-news

FastCounter by LinkExchange